|
|||
|
'07 Authors Insider Tips
FictionCraft by Louisa Burton Formatting Your Manuscript Scams / Choosing an Agent Pitching Your Novel... From The Call to Published... Hard Business From Greg Herren Who Is Telling This Story? It’s Work, Not A Hobby Where Ideas Come From Sexy on the Page With Shanna Germain Plotting Erotic Fiction Seducing Your Muse Creating Characters... Description, Action & Dialogue Fucking on Paper Ten No-Nos of Erotic Fiction Climactic Moments: First Draft Critique Groups Revising Your Erotic Story Finding the Perfect Markets... Just Submit Already Rejections and Acceptances Two Girls Kissing With Amie M. Evans Verb Tense Confusion Coming Up with Story Ideas Attend a Writers’ Conference The Fundamentals of POV Should I Sign That? Etiquette for Authors Erotica is Serious Work No Body Writes for Free... Shameless Self Promotions The Myth of Writer's Block The Write Stuff From Ashley Lister The Time is Write The Beautiful People A Book by Any Other... Synopsis: the Necessary Evil Erotica or Porn? Feedback Whine 2007 Smutters Lounge Ashley Lister Submits by Ashley Lister What's it like being a writer? Blog An Apology to Salespeople Get All Worked Up With J.T. Benjamin About Secrets The Perfect Fuck About Choices The Age of Consent The Kingmaker Kids and Sex M.Y.O.B. The Price of Beauty The G.O.P. All Worked Up About Hate Real Men Pondering Porn With Ann Regentin Good Sex: A Physics Lesson Meet Frankenstein Thoughts on the Orgasm Gap The Very Bloody Marys The Doomsday Erection Online Threesome Porn |
The Write Stuff
I'm not talking here about some esoteric literary theory on the importance of the writer/reader relationship. Does a text exist if no one reads it? Well, I've got titles in the remainder shops that prove without a doubt that yes, a text can exist without anyone reading the damned thing. I've got royalty statements and unread contributor's copies as evidence. I'm not even talking about the important topic of intended audience. Who do we write for? What's the identity of the implied reader? In my case, the implied reader is a rich and elderly widow who is so impressed by my story she wants to bequeath me her massive estate as a small way of saying thank you. However, I realise my opinion on this one is slightly skewed by my natural greed. But today I'm talking about the most invaluable reader – the spouse, partner or trusted friend to whom every writer is indebted. I'm talking about the initial reader: the person to whom every writer says, "Have you got ten minutes to read this and give me some feedback?" (Please note, every writer says, "Have you got ten minutes to read this and give me some feedback?" regardless of the length of the writing involved. The "Have you got ten minutes…?" question is used to refer to flashers that haven't managed a hundred words, as well as epic novels that are too verbose to be encompassed on a single memory stick. We writers are all masters at litotes when it comes to estimating the length of time necessary for a reader to properly peruse and appraise our work. And we understate the imposition we know we are making on initial readers by always asking, "Have you got ten minutes…?") Initial readers are the undervalued champions that we writers exploit for their thoughts on our creation. Initial readers are the individuals that every writer needs when they are desperate to find out if their hard work has been worth the effort or a waste of paper. And initial readers need to be treated with the same professional skill a writer would use in any other aspect of their creative process. Whether your initial reader is a fellow writer, spouse, partner, internet buddy or simply a good and trusted friend, there are certain criteria a reader needs to fulfil before a writer imposes on them and asks for an opinion. Given the credentials that are needed for a good initial reader, perhaps the first thing a writer should do is propose marriage. Trust Trust is important because you don't want to ask FRIEND A to read your manuscript, and then discover that FRIEND A has submitted the bloody thing to a publisher under their own name. Trust is also important because, if you're writing erotic fiction, you don't want FRIEND A reading your manuscript, and then going round and telling everyone from FRIEND B through to FRIEND Z that you're a sick and twisted pervert. Trust is necessary before you show anyone the results of your hard work. Honesty is also imperative. The initial reader is supposed to give feedback, emphasising the good points and mentioning any area that seems potentially weak. Hearing a reader sum up their thoughts with the words, "Yeah. It's OK," is as helpful as having two forks to eat soup. Similarly, having an initial reader say, "I liked it," when they really thought it sucked donkey balls is of no use either. A good initial reader will present their opinions, acknowledging the manuscript's strengths and honestly identifying its weaknesses. Mutual Interest is needed because the story has to be something your reader would want to read. I've had one reader tell me there weren't enough trains in my stories. Especially not diesel engines. The comment was not overly helpful. I only understood that it was a genuine criticism, and not some abstract metaphor, when I studied the reader's library and saw the walls were dominated by countless tomes on the history of railway engines. Had I known my reader was so sad and train-obsessed I would never have asked them to read a book about wife swapping parties. Of course, there are some things a writer has to do before imposing on an initial reader. The manuscript that needs studying has to be of the same standard that would be submitted to an editor. Every writer wants more from an initial reader than the comments, "Your spelling is shite," or "Your printer needs the heads cleaning." Grammar, punctuation, page numbering, formatting and all the other layout necessities should be considered before a MS is handed to an initial reader. And an author should tell the reader what sort of feedback they require. Are the characters believable? Is the plot too simple? Too complex? Is the description effective or intrusive? Is there an area of the plot or background detail where the reader is likely to have specific knowledge? And, if so, can the reader advise if that element has been properly represented in the story, or are their ways it can be improved. Initial readers are not a valuable resource: they are an invaluable resource. Their opinions are not necessarily cast in stone. It's possible to have a reader dislike a story and still make valuable comments. And it's possible for an initial reader to make suggestions that the author doesn't ultimately incorporate into the finished manuscript. But any writer who uses initial readers should make sure they exploit these invaluable resources with the great care that they deserve.Ashley Lister ______
Copyright © 1996 and on, Erotica Readers Association, Inc. |
'07 Book Reviews
Anthologies A for Amour / B for Bondage Review by Ashley Lister Best Women's Erotica '07 Review by Ashley Lister The Butcher, The Baker... Review by Ashley Lister C is for Coeds Review by Ashley Lister Cream: The Best of ERWA Review by Ashley Lister Cream: The Best of ERWA Perceptions by Cervo Coming Together for the Cure Review by Lisabet Cross-Dressing Review by Ashley Lister F is for Fetish Review by Ashley Lister Got a Minute? Review by Ashley Lister He's on Top Review by Ashley Lister Love on the Dark Side Review by Angelika Devlyn Lust: ...Fantasies for Women Review by Ashley Lister The Mammoth Book Vol 6 Review by Lisabet Sarai Naughty Spanking Stories Review by Ashley Lister Quickies 1 Review by Angelika Devlyn She's on Top Review by Ashley Lister Sixteen of the Best Review by Ashley Lister Novels Amorous Woman Review by Lisabet Sarai The Boss Review by Angelika Devlyn Burning Bright Review by Lisabet Sarai Call Me By Your Name Review by Lisabet Sarai Cockhold Review by Lisabet Sarai Continuum Review by Ashley Lister Dark Designs Review by Ashley Lister Equal Opportunities Review by Lisabet Sarai Enthralled Review by Angelika Devlyn Flood Review by Angelika Devlyn Gothic Blue Review by Ashley Lister Hotbed Review by Ashley Liste The Lords of Satyr: Nicholas Review by Helen E. H. Madden Love Song of the Dominatrix Review by Angelika Devlyn Ménage Review by Angelika Devlyn Riding the Storm Review by Lisabet Sarai The Silver Collar Review by Ashley Lister Split Review by Ashley Lister Suite Seventeen Review by Ashley Lister Sweet as Sin Review by Angelika Devlyn Tiffany Twisted Review by Lisabet Sarai Top of Her Game Review by Angelika Devlyn Whalebone Strict Review by Ashley Lister Wife Swap Review by Gary Russell Wings of Madness Review by Angelika Devlyn Gay Erotica Historical Obsessions Review by Erastes Homosex: 60 Years of Gay... Review by Erastes Mammoth Book of New Gay... Review by Erastes Standish Review by Lisabet Sarai Lesbian Erotica Iridescence:...Lesbian Erotica Review by Lisabet Sarai Sex Guides The Path of Service Review by Ashley Lister Secrets of Porn Star Sex Review by Ashley Lister Touch Me There Review by Ashley Lister Non-Fiction Concertina: An Erotic Memoir... Review by Rob Hardy Daddy's Girl Review by Ashley Lister Dirt for Art's Sake Review by Rob Hardy Entangled Lives Review by Lisabet Sarai Impotence: A Cultural History Review by Rob Hardy I, Goldstein: My Screwed... Review by Rob Hardy In Praise of the Whip Review by Rob Hardy Insatiable: ...Porn Star Review by William S. Dean Letters of a Portuguese Nun Review by Rob Hardy Mississippi Sissy Review by Rob Hardy Ron Jeremy Review by Rob Hardy Virgin: The Untouched... Review by Rob Hardy The Year of Yes Review by Rob Hardy |
|